Use cases are how we categorize the content and workflow you actually have — website, e-commerce, software UI strings, contracts, packaging, e-learning, and more. They’re the fastest way to anticipate what matters in production: file formats, update cycles, layout constraints, terminology needs, review loops, and turnaround expectations.

A use case is not a promise that everything in that category will be “easy” or “fast”. But skimming this page will help you formulate an opinion onwhether we might be the right fit for your needs.

Localization stage describes how mature your multilingual operation is — not what you translate, but how you do it. It helps us anticipate what will matter next in practice: ownership and roles, asset readiness (glossary/TM/style), tooling and handoffs, review capacity, and how to keep quality stable as volume and speed increase.

It’s not a “maturity badge” or a promise that later stages are always better. Many teams should stay lightweight for a long time. Overbuilding a localization program can waste resources and slow you down. The right stage is the one that matches your current growth, risk, and internal capacity.

An Industrie label is not a quality indicator by itself. “We do fintech” wouldn't mean anything, if the linguists we assign a project to are not specialised in financial translations and the workflows we deploy don’t match the risk. Domain expertise lives primarily with the linguists; our job is to select them, brief them, and run a process that makes quality repeatable.

The languages we can cover aren’t limited by our in-house team’s proficiency. They’re limited by whether we can reliably source linguists with the right language and subject-matter expertise — and set up the workflow around them to deliver consistently. That’s why we treat language coverage as an operational topic: sourcing and briefing, review capacity, asset readiness, and the practical realities of file formats, layout, and tooling.

Some languages add extra coordination — especially non-Latin scripts and right-to-left layouts, or cases where desktop publishing and time zones become part of delivery.

We don’t intend to position ourselves as a universal provider, and this category is where we make our comfort zone visible: the operating realities we can work within, the constraints we plan for, and the boundaries we won’t cross.
Growth stage and size tend to correlate with practical factors — decision speed, stakeholder count, asset maturity, and review and approval bandwidth (who can sign off, and how quickly). By being explicit about what we’re set up for, we can commit with confidence when there’s a fit — and avoid vague “yes” answers that turn into chaos later.